A fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran appeared to unravel on Friday after Washington launched airstrikes on Iranian missile and drone facilities, accusing Tehran of attacking a commercial cargo vessel in the Strait of Hormuz.
The strikes marked the first direct US military action since both sides signed a memorandum of understanding in Switzerland aimed at easing tensions in the Gulf.
Iran responded swiftly. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it had targeted US military positions in the region, warning that Washington’s actions would be met with a “decisive response.” Reuters reported that the retaliatory strikes followed repeated Iranian warnings that the US attack would not go unanswered. Neither side immediately disclosed the locations hit or the extent of the damage.
Trump signals action
US President Donald Trump had hinted at military action hours before the operation.
When asked by reporters whether the US would retaliate against Iran, Trump replied, “You’ll find out.”
Soon afterwards, US Central Command (CENTCOM) announced that American forces had carried out precision strikes on Iranian missile depots, drone storage facilities and coastal radar installations.
According to CENTCOM, the operation was launched in response to an alleged Iranian drone strike on the Singapore-flagged cargo ship M/V Ever Lovely on June 25. The vessel was sailing off the coast of Oman after exiting the Strait of Hormuz when it was reportedly hit by a one-way attack drone.
US says Iran breached ceasefire
Calling the operation “a powerful response,” CENTCOM accused Iran of violating the ceasefire understanding by targeting commercial shipping.
“The unwarranted aggression against commercial shipping by Iranian forces clearly violated the ceasefire,” the command said.
It added that US forces would continue safeguarding freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s busiest maritime trade corridors.
Vice President JD Vance reinforced Washington’s position in a post on X.
“Iran signed a ceasefire agreement. We have honored it. If they have disagreements about how the MOU is being applied, they can pick up the phone. But violence will be met with violence,” Vance wrote.
Iran hits back with warning
Tehran rejected the US accusations and condemned the strikes, accusing Washington of acting in bad faith despite ongoing diplomatic engagement.
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi criticised a joint statement by the US and six Gulf nations opposing Tehran’s proposal to levy transit charges on ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz.
“Safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz cannot be guaranteed under arrangements that ignore Iran’s role as a coastal state,” he wrote on X.
Meanwhile, Ebrahim Azizi, chairman of Iran’s parliamentary National Security Commission, accused the US of launching attacks in the middle of negotiations and warned that Washington’s actions would end in “retreat and regret.”
Strait of Hormuz tensions deepen
The latest military exchange has once again placed the Strait of Hormuz at the centre of global attention. Nearly 20 per cent of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas shipments pass through the narrow waterway, making any disruption a major concern for global energy markets.
Bloomberg reported that Oman has informed regional partners that transit fees for ships using the strait could be introduced in the future, although no formal decision has been announced.
Iranian state television also claimed the IRGC warned off three foreign oil tankers attempting what it described as an “unauthorised passage” through the strait. No further details about the vessels were released.
Amid the escalating US-Iran tensions, a separate diplomatic breakthrough emerged in the region. Israel and Lebanon signed a US-mediated framework agreement aimed at ending cross-border hostilities and paving the way for Hezbollah’s eventual disarmament. Hezbollah, however, has rejected the proposal and said it will not cooperate.
Comments are closed.